DTEXT - Text messaging intervention to improve outcomes of people with type 2 diabetes: Protocol for randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis

12Citations
Citations of this article
278Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Diabetes prevalence is rapidly increasing, with type 2 diabetes predicted to be the leading contributor of non-communicable disease in Australia by 2020. It is anticipated that rates of type 2 diabetes will continue to increase if factors such as overweight and obesity, low physical activity and poor nutrition are not addressed. The majority of Australians with type 2 diabetes do not meet the guidelines for optimal diabetes management, and access to diabetes education is limited. This highlights the need for new interventions that can reduce existing barriers to diabetes education, attain greater population reach and support self-management strategies for people with type 2 diabetes. Mobile phone text messages have shown promising results as an intervention for people with chronic disease. They have the ability to achieve high levels of engagement and broad population reach, whilst requiring minimal resources. There is however, no evidence on the effect of text messaging to improve the health of people with type 2 diabetes in Australia. Methods/Design: This randomised controlled trial aims to investigate if a 6 month text message intervention (DTEXT) can lead to improvements in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and diabetes self-management among Australian residents in New South Wales (NSW) with type 2 diabetes. Community dwelling adults (n = 340) will be recruited with the primary outcome being change in HbA1c at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include behaviour change for diabetes self-management, self-efficacy, quality of life and intervention acceptability. An economic evaluation will be conducted using a funder plus patient perspective. Discussion: This study will provide evidence on the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a text message intervention to reduce HbA1c and enhance self-management of type 2 diabetes in the Australian population. If successful, this intervention could be used as a model to complement and extend existing diabetes care in the Australian health care system. Trial Registration: The study has been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, Trial ID: ACTRN12617000416392. Registered: 23 March 2017.

References Powered by Scopus

The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions

7671Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

6533Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Better reporting of interventions: Template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide

6300Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Effectiveness and acceptability of a text message intervention (DTEXT) on HbA1c and self-management for people with type 2 diabetes. A randomized controlled trial

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Impact of personalized text messages from pharmacists on medication adherence in type 2 diabetes in France: A real-world, randomized, comparative study

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The feasibility, acceptability and potential efficacy of a parental text message and social media program on children's vegetable consumption and movement behaviours: A pilot randomised controlled trial

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Waller, K., Furber, S., Bauman, A., Allman-Farinelli, M., Van Den Dolder, P., Hayes, A., … Colagiuri, S. (2019). DTEXT - Text messaging intervention to improve outcomes of people with type 2 diabetes: Protocol for randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. BMC Public Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6550-6

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250255075100

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 75

71%

Researcher 16

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 11

10%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 44

46%

Medicine and Dentistry 36

38%

Social Sciences 9

9%

Psychology 7

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0