Time varying networks and the weakness of strong ties

185Citations
Citations of this article
230Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In most social and information systems the activity of agents generates rapidly evolving time-varying networks. The temporal variation in networks' connectivity patterns and the ongoing dynamic processes are usually coupled in ways that still challenge our mathematical or computational modelling. Here we analyse a mobile call dataset and find a simple statistical law that characterize the temporal evolution of users' egocentric networks. We encode this observation in a reinforcement process defining a time-varying network model that exhibits the emergence of strong and weak ties. We study the effect of time-varying and heterogeneous interactions on the classic rumour spreading model in both synthetic, and real-world networks. We observe that strong ties severely inhibit information diffusion by confining the spreading process among agents with recurrent communication patterns. This provides the counterintuitive evidence that strong ties may have a negative role in the spreading of information across networks.

References Powered by Scopus

Networks: An Introduction

9271Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Complex networks: Structure and dynamics

9106Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks

4801Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Statistical physics of vaccination

789Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modern temporal network theory: a colloquium

516Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A survey of results on mobile phone datasets analysis

434Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karsai, M., Perra, N., & Vespignani, A. (2014). Time varying networks and the weakness of strong ties. Scientific Reports, 4. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04001

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 114

62%

Researcher 40

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 19

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 10

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 45

38%

Physics and Astronomy 33

28%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21

18%

Social Sciences 20

17%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free