When behavior is interpreted in a reliable manner (i.e., robustly across different situations and times) its explained meaning may be seen to possess hermeneutic consistency. In this essay I present an evaluation of the hermeneutic consistency that I propose may be present when the research tool known as the mapping sentence is used to create generic structural ontologies. I also claim that theoretical and empirical validity is a likely result of employing the mapping sentence in research design and interpretation. These claims are non-contentious within the realm of quantitative psychological and behavioral research. However, I extend the scope of both facet theory based research and claims for its structural utility, reliability and validity to philosophical and qualitative investigations. I assert that the hermeneutic consistency of a structural ontology is a product of a structural representation's ontological components and the mereological relationships between these ontological sub-units: The mapping sentence seminally allows for the depiction of such structure.
CITATION STYLE
Hackett, P. M. W. (2016). Facet theory and the mapping sentence as hermeneutically consistent structured meta-ontology and structured meta-mereology. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(MAR). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00471
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.