Flow and leisure

11Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Leisure has eluded definition by social scientists despite decades of theory, research, and applied work on the topic. According to one analysis (Primeau LA, Am J Occup Ther 50:569-577, 1996), there are three prominent ways of defining leisure; as: (a) the residual time available outside of productive and maintenance activity (sometimes simply described as non-work time); (b) the set of activities that people identify as leisure pursuits in a culture, and (c) a positive experiential state whose essence is the experience of being freely chosen and intrinsically rewarding. Each definition has limitations and the lack of consensus has been a challenge for the field of leisure science. However we choose to define and delimit the phenomenon of leisure, we probably can agree that we think of the paradigmatic leisure experience as a positive one. Of course, all periods of discretionary time and all normatively defined leisure activities are not positive experientially.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Perkins, K., & Nakamura, J. (2013). Flow and leisure. In Positive Leisure Science: From Subjective Experience to Social Contexts (pp. 141–157). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5058-6_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free