Cycling as the best sub-8-hour performance predictor in full distance triathlon

16Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

For any triathlon distance (short, Olympic, half-distance and full-distance), competitors spend more time cycling than swimming or running, but running has emerged as the discipline with the greatest influence on overall performance at the Olympic distance. However, there is a lack of evidence on which discipline has the greatest influence on performance in the overall full-distance triathlon (3.8 km swimming/180 km cycling/42.195 km running), especially for the fastest performing athletes of all time. The total race times of 51 fastest triathletes (sub-8-hour) were studied, while for the split times, a sample of 44 participants was considered. The discipline that seemed to better predict total race time was cycling (coefficient = 0.828; p < 0.001), followed by running (coefficient = 0.726; p < 0.001) and swimming (coefficient = 0.476; p < 0.001). Furthermore, cycling was the discipline with the highest performance improvement over the years, whereas running had a slightly decrease. In conclusion, cycling seems to be the discipline with greater influence in final result for the full-distance triathlon.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sousa, C. V., Barbosa, L. P., Sales, M. M., Santos, P. A., Tiozzo, E., Simões, H. G., … Knechtle, B. (2019). Cycling as the best sub-8-hour performance predictor in full distance triathlon. Sports, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/sports7010024

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free