Involvement of carboxyl groups in chloride transport and reversible DIDS binding to band 3 protein in human erythrocytes

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Noncovalent DIDS binding to Band 3 (AE1) protein in human erythrocyte membranes, modified by non-penetrating, water soluble 1-ethyl-3-(4-azonia-4,4-dimethylpentyl)-carbodiimide iodide (EAC), was studied at 0°C in the presence of 165 mM KCl. Under experimental conditions applied up to (48 ± 5) % of irreversible chloride self-exchange inhibition was observed. The apparent dissociation constant, KD, for "DIDS-Band 3" complex, determined from the chloride transport experiments, was (34 ± 3) nM and (80 ± 12) nM for control and EAC-treated resealed ghosts, respectively. The inhibition constant, Ki, for DIDS was (35 ± 6) nM and (60 ± 8) nM in control and EAC-treated ghosts, respectively. The reduced affinity for DIDS reversible binding was not a result of negative cooperativity of DIDS binding sites of Band 3 oligomer since Hill's coefficients were indistinguishable from 1 (within the limit error) both for control and EAC-treated ghosts. By using tritium-labeled DIDS, 4,4'-diisothiocyanato-2,2'-stilbenedisulfonate ([3H]DIDS), the association rate constant, k+1 (M-1s-1), was measured. The mean values of (4. 3 ± 0. 7) × 105 M-1s-1 for control and (2. 7 ± 0. 7) × 105 M-1s-1 for EAC-treated ghosts were obtained. The mean values for KD, evaluated from [3H]DIDS binding measurements, were (37 ± 9) nM and (90 ± 21) nM for control and EAC-modified ghosts, respectively. The results demonstrate that EAC modification of AE1 reduces about 2-fold the affinity of AE1 for DIDS. It is suggested that half of the subunits are modified near the transport site by EAC. © 2011 Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Wien.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Janas, T., & Janas, T. (2011). Involvement of carboxyl groups in chloride transport and reversible DIDS binding to band 3 protein in human erythrocytes. Cellular and Molecular Biology Letters, 16(2), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11658-011-0010-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free