Partner Selection for Open Innovation

  • Z. Solesvik M
  • Gulbrandsen M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper we propose to consider open innovation from the point of view of causation and effectuation approaches (Sarasvathy, 2008) and a social networking perspective. Our empirical evidence consists of a case study of an ongoing open innovation project aimed to create a hybrid ship which uses liquid natural gas (LNG) and hydrogen as power sources. The results show that the effectuation approach is preferable to open innovation when the initiator of open innovation aims to keep sensitive information inside the closed group, has established an effective team of representatives from other firms from earlier innovation projects, and participants are situated closely geographically.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Z. Solesvik, M., & Gulbrandsen, M. (2013). Partner Selection for Open Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(4), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview674

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free