Question prompts to empower cancer patients: results of a randomized controlled trial

10Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: In addition to question prompts for information transfer, we also used prompts to facilitate the expression of emotions. Our aim was to investigate how a question prompt list (QPL) is accepted by patients and whether it enhances interactional empowerment of the patients in the consultation with the radio-oncological treatment team before the beginning of radiotherapy. Methodology: Adult cancer patients before the beginning of radiotherapy were randomly assigned to the intervention group (IG) or control group (CG). The patients in the IG received a QPL with predefined subsets and subject areas. After the physician’s consultation, both groups completed a self-developed, content validated questionnaire on interactional empowerment. The IG evaluated the QPL using a self-developed instrument. Result: A total of 279 adult cancer patients participated in the study (IG n = 139/CG n = 140). The participants of the IG reported a significantly higher interactional empowerment compared with those of the CG (t(277) = − 2.71, p =.007, 95% CI [− 1.61, − 0.26], d = 0.29). 60.4% of the IG agreed “rather” or “very” that they used the QPL in consultation with the medical team. Conclusion: The QPL used in the consultation improved the self-assessed competence for interaction with the medical team and strengthened the interactional empowerment. The QPL was well accepted by the patients and is to be introduced into a routine as a practicable and simple instrument in the future. The support of patients in addressing concerns and fears is an important innovation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zetzl, T., Mann, D., Gruner, S., Schuler, M., Jentschke, E., Neuderth, S., … van Oorschot, B. (2020). Question prompts to empower cancer patients: results of a randomized controlled trial. Supportive Care in Cancer, 28(6), 2571–2579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05036-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free