Evaluation of the Fermentative Capacity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CAT-1 and BB9 Strains and Pichia kudriavzevii BB2 at Simulated Industrial Conditions

5Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The search for promising yeasts that surpass the fermentative capacity of commercial strains, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae CAT-1, is of great importance for industrial ethanol processes in the world. Two yeasts, Pichia kudriavzevii BB2 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae BB9, were evaluated in comparison to the industrial yeast S. cerevisiae CAT-1. The objective was to evaluate the performance profile of the three studied strains in terms of growth, substrate consumption, and metabolite formation, aiming to determine their behaviour in different media and pH conditions. The results showed that under cultivation conditions simulating the medium used in the industrial process (must at 22° Brix at pH 3.0) the highest ethanol productivity was 0.41 g L−1 h−1 for S. cerevisiae CAT-1, compared to 0.11 g L−1 h−1 and 0.16 g L−1 h−1 for P. kudriavzevii and S. cerevisiae BB2, respectively. S. cerevisiae CAT-1 produced three times more ethanol in must at pH 3.0 (28.30 g L−1) and in mineral medium at pH 3.0 (29.17 g L−1) and 5.0 (30.70 g L−1) when compared to the value obtained in sugarcane must pH 3.0 (9.89 g L−1). It was concluded that S. cerevisiae CAT-1 was not limited by the variation in pH in the mineral medium due to its nutritional composition, guaranteeing better performance of the yeast even in the presence of stressors. Only S. cerevisiae CAT-1 expressed he constitutive invertase enzyme, which is responsible for hydrolysing the sucrose contained in the must.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fernandes, A. M. O., Garcia, N. F. L., Fonseca, G. G., Leite, R. S. R., & da Paz, M. F. (2020). Evaluation of the Fermentative Capacity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CAT-1 and BB9 Strains and Pichia kudriavzevii BB2 at Simulated Industrial Conditions. Indian Journal of Microbiology, 60(4), 494–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-020-00891-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free