Lessons learnt from anonymized review of cases of peripartum hysterectomy by international experts: A qualitative pilot study

3Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Severe obstetric complications are not extensively studied and individual cases are used too little and inappropriately in quality improvement activities, due to limited numbers and prioritization of quantitative research. Nordic and European experts performed a qualitative pilot study using anonymized cases of peripartum hysterectomy. It was feasible to anonymize narratives and we learned lessons in the form of themes for improved clinical care and future research. Therefore, we plan a Nordic anonymized review of the care of women who have undergone peripartum hysterectomy based on narratives. The qualitative outcomes of clinically relevant themes for quality improvement and research will add value to the quantitative analyses from the Nordic medical birth registries. In the longer term, we believe that qualitative audits should be an essential part of the process of continuing improvement in maternity care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jónasdóttir, E., Aabakke, A. J. M., Colmorn, L. B., Jakobsson, M., Äyräs, O., Baghestan, E., … Langhoff-Roos, J. (2019, August 1). Lessons learnt from anonymized review of cases of peripartum hysterectomy by international experts: A qualitative pilot study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13601

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free