Serial evaluation of segmental esophageal reconstruction using a polyurethane scaffold in a pig model

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Many esophageal pathologies are clinically treated by resection and reconstruction of the esophagus. Surgical esophagectomy remains a morbid procedure and despite minimally invasive advances, has changed little in decades. Novel approaches to esophageal segmental resection and reconstruction are an unmet need. Methods: Circumferential thoracic esophageal transection was performed in both male and female pigs and the defects reconstructed using 5 or 10 cm polyurethane (PU) tubular grafts and stented. A subset were treated with stent only. Animals were survived to 14, 30, 60, and 399 days. Tissues were evaluated histologically, and via non-invasive serial endoscopy and contrast swallowing studies in long-term animals. Results: Luminal patency was achieved in all animals with no clinical evidence of leak. In short-term animals, there was healing noted in all cases with a variably sized region of ulceration remaining at the most central part of the repaired tube (between the proximal and distal anastomosis). In four long-term animals following stent removal, two resumed normal diet and thrived, while two animals were euthanized prior to the proposed endpoint because of stricture formation and inability to tolerate a normal diet. Re-epithelialization was observed in all groups, and more complete over time. Conclusions: The PU scaffold provides a matrix across which formation of new tissue can occur. The mechanisms through which this happens remain unclear, but likely a combination of fibrosis and tissue contraction, in conjunction with new tissue formation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sarrafian, T. L., Brazzell, J. L., Barron, M., Aho, J., Blanco, E., Powell, C., … Wigle, D. A. (2022). Serial evaluation of segmental esophageal reconstruction using a polyurethane scaffold in a pig model. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 14(6), 1830–1839. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-1559

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free