Exploring experiences of food insecurity, stigma, social exclusion, and shame among women in high-income countries: A narrative review

  • Pineau C
  • Williams P
  • Brady J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In Canada, over 4.4 million people experience food insecurity, a serious public health issue characterized by inadequate or insecure access to food due to financial constraints. Globally, women experience disproportionately high rates of food insecurity, which can be a highly stigmatizing experience that is associated with feelings of shame and social isolation. This narrative review explores how and why social beliefs and stigma contribute to social exclusion among women experiencing food insecurity within high-income countries, and how enhancing the capacity for empathetic responses to feelings of shame, and efforts to strengthen women’s resilience to shame, can lead to a reduction in stigma. The thematic analysis of the articles included in this review resulted in four themes: 1) the mechanisms of food insecurity-related social exclusion; 2) charitable responses to food insecurity and stigma, shame, and social exclusion; 3) women’s experiences with food insecurity, stigma, shame, and social exclusion; and 4) empathy and shame resilience. The findings of this review suggest that dominant responses to food insecurity contribute to stigma, shame, and social exclusion among women, and that the inadequacy of existing policy responses to address food insecurity has wide-reaching ramifications on the health and well-being of women and their families.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pineau, C., Williams, P. L., Brady, J., Waddington, M., & Frank, L. (2021). Exploring experiences of food insecurity, stigma, social exclusion, and shame among women in high-income countries: A narrative review. Canadian Food Studies / La Revue Canadienne Des Études Sur l’alimentation, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.15353/cfs-rcea.v8i3.473

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

68%

Researcher 3

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 7

50%

Environmental Science 3

21%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

14%

Psychology 2

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free