Anatomy of knowledge bases used in design science research: A literature review

8Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Several papers have addressed the theory foundation of DSR. While researchers usually emphasize that the existence of such a knowledge base (KB) is essential for high quality design science research (DSR), opinions depart what kind of knowledge comprises such a knowledge base and which qualitative requirements apply regarding the knowledge leveraged. Some researchers demand that DSR is based on descriptive formal theories, while other scholars extend the width of the knowledge base also to unverified empirical evidence, conceptual knowledge and prescriptive knowledge. In order to provide some guidance for practical DSR, we apply literature review methodology on recent DSR articles to determine the common practice regarding the use and development of knowledge bases in previous projects. Based on this investigation, we discuss current issues, derive implications for future research and suggest measures to strengthen the role of the knowledge base in DSR. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gaß, O., Koppenhagen, N., Biegel, H., Maedche, A., & Müller, B. (2012). Anatomy of knowledge bases used in design science research: A literature review. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7286 LNCS, pp. 328–344). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_24

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free