Fast Flexible Paxos: Relaxing Quorum Intersection for Fast Paxos

11Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Paxos, the de facto standard approach to solving distributed consensus, operates in two phases, each of which requires an intersecting quorum of nodes. Multi-Paxos reduces this to one phase by electing a leader but this leader is also a performance bottleneck. Fast Paxos bypasses the leader but has stronger quorum intersection requirements. In this paper we observe that Fast Paxos' intersection requirements can be safely relaxed, reducing to just one additional intersection requirement between phase-1 quorums and any pair of fast round phase-2 quorums. We thus find that the quorums used with Fast Paxos are larger than necessary, allowing alternative quorum systems to obtain new tradeoffs between performance and fault-tolerance.

References Powered by Scopus

Impossibility of Distributed Consensus with One Faulty Process

3029Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Part-Time Parliament

1961Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Implementing Fault-Tolerant Services Using the State Machine Approach: A Tutorial

1550Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Drone swarms as networked control systems by integration of networking and computing

56Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How to Trust Strangers: Composition of Byzantine Quorum Systems

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Formal Specification of Dynamic Load-Based Coordinator Selection Algorithm with Recovery in Distributed Systems

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Howard, H., Charapko, A., & Mortier, R. (2021). Fast Flexible Paxos: Relaxing Quorum Intersection for Fast Paxos. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (pp. 186–190). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3427796.3427815

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

50%

Researcher 2

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 7

78%

Environmental Science 1

11%

Engineering 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0