Domains of Judgment upon the Expert’s Opinion in Contemporary Financial Transactions Murabaha to Purchase Orderer, and Contracting Companies as Examples

Abstract

This research discusses the domains of making judgments upon expert’s opinion in contemporary nancial transactions. Both researchers start by presenting the concept of the expert, revealing its types, clarifying its terms, and determining the extent of its power. e researchers then discuss the domains of referring to expert’s opinions relevant to two questions of contemporary nancial transactions, namely: Murabaha to purchase orderer and contracting companies. is paper draws a number of ndings, the most important of which are: Expert's opinion can be referred to an indemnity for damages in Murabaha to the purchase orderer in two cases: indemnity for nancial damages caused by the nancial institution, such as: returning defective merchandise. e second case is indemnity for nancial damages caused by the purchase orderer, such as the buyer's abstention from buying the items ordered for purchase. In contracting companies, an expert’s opinion is referred to in two cases as well: rst: indemnity for nancial damages caused by contracting companies, such as compensation for not completing the contract. e second case is compensation for nancial damages caused by the client, such as compensation for not enabling the contractor to complete the contract.