Conclusion: Recalling the Plague of 1665 in Later Literary Culture

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

When plague struck Marseilles, France, in 1720, lines of communication for Londoners were free and effective enough by way of printed materials that citizens could track the rise of the disease in an array of documents. Sparking worry of an outbreak in London and jolting memories of the city’s dire affliction in 1665, plague on the continent drove Londoners to consider the information available to them to fend off and manage another epidemic in the metropolis. With Londoners clamouring for information about plague, Defoe published A Journal of the Plague Year, a text that brought readers back to 1665. Though published in 1722, 57 years following the 1665 plague in London, A Journal of the Plague Year exists as a testament to the opportunities afforded by early modern print culture to compiling and narrating a story of the illness. Even decades following the outbreak itself—Defoe was only a child in 1665—he was able to narrate a convincing image of the plague.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miller, K. (2016). Conclusion: Recalling the Plague of 1665 in Later Literary Culture. In Early Modern Literature in History (pp. 211–217). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51057-0_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free