Comparative Study of Different Clustering Algorithms

  • PATIL A
  • PATIL C
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper presents a detailed study and comparison of different clustering based image segmentation algorithms. The traditional clustering algorithms are the hard clustering algorithm and the soft clustering algorithm. We have compared the hard k-means algorithm with the soft fuzzy c-means (FCM) algorithm. To overcome the limitations of conventional FCM we have also studied Kernel fuzzy c-means (KFCM) algorithm in detail. The K-means algorithm is sensitive to noise and outliers so, an extension of K-means called as Fuzzy c-means (FCM) are introduced. FCM allows data points to belong to more than one cluster where each data point has a degree of membership of belonging to each cluster. The KFCM uses a mapping function and gives better performance than FCM in case of noise corrupted images.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

PATIL, A. J., PATIL, C. S., KARHE, R. R., & AHER, M. A. (2014). Comparative Study of Different Clustering Algorithms. International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, 3(7), 10490–10497. https://doi.org/10.15662/ijareeie.2014.0307015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free