mODa 9 – Advances in Model-Oriented Design and Analysis

  • Jones B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper deals with the problem of allocating patients to two competing treatments in the presence of covariates in order to achieve a good trade-off between efficiency, ethical concern and randomization. We propose a compound criterion that combines inferential precision and ethical gain by flexible weights depending on the unknown treatment effects. In the absence of treatment-covariate interactions, this criterion leads to a locally optimal allocation which does not depend on the covariates and can be targeted by a suitable implementation of the doubly-adaptive biased coin design aimed at balancing the roles of randomization, ethics and information. Some properties of the suggested procedure are described.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jones, B. (2010). mODa 9 – Advances in Model-Oriented Design and Analysis, (October 2010), 0–15. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-7908-2410-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free