Selecting controls for assessing interaction in nested case-control studies

17Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Two methods for selecting controls in nested case-control studies - matching on Xand counter matching on X - are compared when interest is in interaction between a risk factor X measured in the full cohort and another risk factor Z measured only in the case-control sample. This is important because matching provides efficiency gains relative to random sampling when X is uncommon and the interaction is positive (greater than multiplicative), whereas counter matching is generally efficient compared to random sampling. Methods: Matching and counter matching were compared to each other and to random sampling of controls for dichotomous X and Z. Comparison was by simulation, using as an example a published study of radiation and other risk factors for breast cancer in the Japanese atomic-bomb survivors, and by asymptotic relative efficiency calculations for a wide range of parameters specifying the prevalence of X and Z as well as the levels of correlation and interaction between them. Focus was on analyses utilizing general models for the joint risk of X and Z. Results: Counter-matching performed better than matching or random sampling in terms of efficiency for inference about interaction in the case of a rare risk factor X and uncorrelated risk factor Z. Further, more general, efficiency calculations demonstrated that counter-matching is generally efficient relative to matched case-control designs for studying interaction. Conclusions: Because counter-matched designs may be analyzed using standard statistical methods and allow investigation of confounding of the effect of X, whereas matched designs require a non-standard approach when fitting general risk models and do not allow investigating the adjusted risk of X, it is concluded that counter-matching on X can be a superior alternative to matching on X in nested case-control studies of interaction when X is known at the time of case-control sampling.

References Powered by Scopus

Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, part I. Cancer: 1950-1990

671Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Concepts of interaction

509Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The design of case-control studies: The influence of confounding and interaction effects

249Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Study design: Evaluating gene-environment interactions in the etiology of breast cancer - the WECARE study

110Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma in a Japanese population: A nested case-control study

86Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Serum interleukin-6 associated with hepatocellular carcinoma risk: A nested case-control study

82Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cologne, J. B., & Langholz, B. (2003). Selecting controls for assessing interaction in nested case-control studies. Journal of Epidemiology, 13(4), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.13.193

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

56%

Researcher 4

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

19%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 9

69%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

15%

Sports and Recreations 1

8%

Mathematics 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free