Selfhood and morality: East Asian and western dimensions

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Chapter 6 proposes that contrasting views of selfhood and its role in social human life account for the most important differences between the East Asian and Western ethical traditions. A comparison of these views is helpful to flesh out the different perceptions of morality. It is proposed that Western thinking is characterized by a strong focus on the self, and that while Western ethical thinkers and schools certainly seek to reduce self-centeredness, such endeavors generally proceed through an augmentation of the role of human reason and thus an intense and even tormenting self-consciousness. A clear reflection of this tendency is the ethical approach to moral issues qua issues associated with individual action and rational choice. The East Asian approach differs in that it seeks to balance excessive introspection with a cultivated sense of identification with the whole, be it society or the natural realm. While this approach, it seems, largely succeeds in preventing an existential kind of agony, it nevertheless suffers from some other serious weaknessess. Hence each tradition, it is argued, has something to offer the other. Chapter 6 offers a brief outline of the two approaches that may, one hopes, act as a first step toward that purpose.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sigurðsson, G. (2018). Selfhood and morality: East Asian and western dimensions. In Social Theory and Asian Dialogues: Cultivating Planetary Conversations (pp. 109–125). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7095-2_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free