Dilemmas and Paradoxes, Chiasmic Organizing

  • Küpers W
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The following shows how the relational ontology of Merleau-Ponty offers revealing descriptions and provides informative possibilities for a different interpretation of organization, its members and its practice, especially in understanding ways of dealing with dilemmas and paradoxes. In particular, the idea of the working of chiasm and chiasmic ‘Flesh’ provides a concept and metaphor as well as a base for a corresponding ‘inter-practice’ in organizations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Küpers, W. M. (2015). Dilemmas and Paradoxes, Chiasmic Organizing. In Phenomenology of the Embodied Organization (pp. 197–236). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137460554_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free