Perceived work self-efficacy, and characteristics of return to work in women survivors of breast cancer at two reference centers in Colombia

2Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Return to work and permanence in employment of women who survive breast cancer are topics that become important as incidence and survival rates increase. Self-ef-ficacy as a modifiable element is of special interest in this process. The objective of this study is to measure the level of self-efficacy in female breast cancer survivors, according to sociodemographic, work and treatment characteristics and their relationship with return to work. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study, based on a survey of breast cancer patients about their demographic and work characteristics, the return to work process, permanence in the same job and the level of work self-efficacy. Differences in the level of self-efficacy with respect to characteristics were evaluated using bivariate analyses and hypothesis statistical testing. A value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: One hundred and twenty-four women were included, 87.9% had returned to work, the majority (56.4%) between one and six months after treatment, 67.7% remained in the same job. Higher levels of work self-efficacy were related to a higher probability of returning to work and staying there, and a shorter time to return to work; these differences were statistically significant. Conclusion: Occupational health and risk prevention services must consider and strength-en work self-efficacy and organizational support in breast cancer survivors to achieve a successful return to work.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vásquez Trespalacios, E. M., Oliveros Riveros, L. M., & Mercado González, D. C. (2024). Perceived work self-efficacy, and characteristics of return to work in women survivors of breast cancer at two reference centers in Colombia. Archivos de Prevencion Riesgos Laborales, 27(2), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2024.27.02.03

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free