Reconceptualising 'integration as a two-way process'

87Citations
Citations of this article
108Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this article, I advocate the reconceptualisation of 'integration as a two-way process'. I argue that integration is, fundamentally, an issue of relational inequality, and conceptualising it as a one-way process constitutes problems of undesirability and infeasibility. I show the theoretical hiatus which characterises many dominant approaches to the two-way process, which leads scholars to build their work on internal contradictions and to implicitly (and often unintentionally) feed into a one-way integration discourse. I argue that as long as conceptualisations of integration as a two-way process reinforce a boundary between 'people who integrate' and 'people who do not integrate', they are unfit to avoid the problems of one-wayness which they intended to overcome in the first place. In the last part of the article, I put forward some initial building blocks for a new theoretical framework of 'integration as a two-way process' which is more attentive to the relational social processes that constitute integration.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Klarenbeek, L. M. (2021). Reconceptualising “integration as a two-way process.” Migration Studies, 9(3), 902–921. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnz033

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free