Cross-cultural study of perception of humor by english native speakers and Iranian EFL learners

3Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

As an instance of foreign language comprehension, L2 humor perception is proved to be challenging for the foreign language learners. However, the body of literature is heavier on the side of humor production than humor perception. The current study explores the extent to which Iranian English as foreign language (EFL) learners perceive different types of English humor in comparison with the English native speakers. The participants were 153 Iranian EFL learners at intermediate level of language proficiency who were randomly selected from English language learners from several English language institutes in Shiraz, Iran, and 30 American English native speakers who voluntarily participated in this study. A questionnaire consisting of six contextualized jokes of three major types of universal, cultural, and linguistic (with morphological, phonological, lexical, and syntactic subcategories) was developed based on Schmitz's (2002) classification of verbal humor to obtain the quantitative data. Moreover, a semi-structured interview was conducted to elicit the perception of those participants who did not find the jokes humorous. The results showed that the majority of Iranian EFL participants did not realize the humor in the jokes. Additionally, the findings revealed that generally speaking, Iranian EFL learners' perception of humor is significantly lower in all types of jokes examined. The best perceived type of humor was found to be the linguistic humor of morphological type for the Iranian EFL learners and the lexical type for English native speakers. It was also discovered that the phonological humor was the least perceived type of humor for both Iranian EFL learners and English native speakers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Farnia, M., Farhangi, A., & Saeedi, M. (2020). Cross-cultural study of perception of humor by english native speakers and Iranian EFL learners. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(2), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.24191/AJUE.V16I2.7914

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free