Commentary for the RAIN Symposium: Dutch Water Infrastructure Challenged by Climate Change

2Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The Netherlands has a history of land reclamation from the sea. They deploy a large amount of infrastructure for water management, e.g., dike rings, pumping stations, drainage canals, and almost every water body in the country is under engineered control. The Dutch consider land as a precious good that shouldn’t be spoiled and as a result, infrastructure is never abandoned, but preferably refurbished, renovated, reinforced or replaced. Over the past 30 years, the Dutch learned that water cannot only be turned and controlled with infrastructure but should also be accommodated and accepted as a guiding principle in spatial policy making. In this commentary we compare lessons from the Netherlands with Florida where engineered water control has also reached its limits. The Dutch developed a Room for the River Program to accommodate more water, a Freshwater Strategy to better utilize the underground sponge capacity, and a Spatial Adaptation Program to better adapt to weather extremes in urban areas.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kuks, S. M. M. (2023). Commentary for the RAIN Symposium: Dutch Water Infrastructure Challenged by Climate Change. Public Works Management and Policy, 28(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X221128814

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free