Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of Short-Term Functional Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

8Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a systemic inflammatory biomarker, has been associated with poorer outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients. The present study was designed to expand these findings by investigating the association between NLR and short-term functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated patients within 7 days after the onset of acute ischemic stroke. Stroke severity on admission was measured using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The functional outcomes were assessed using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Manual Function Test (MFT), the Korean version of the modified Barthel Index (K-MBI), and the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) within 2 weeks of stroke onset. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was evaluated at discharge. Results: This study included 201 patients, who were grouped into three NLR tertiles (<1.84, 1.84–2.71, and >2.71) on admission. A multivariate analysis showed that the top tertile group (NLR > 2.71) had significantly higher risks of unfavorable outcomes on the K-MBI (p = 0.010) and K-MMSE (p = 0.029) than the bottom tertile group (NLR < 1.84). Based on the optimal cut-off values from a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, a higher NLR was significantly associated with higher NIHSS scores (p = 0.011) and unfavorable outcomes on the K-MBI (p = 0.002) and K-MMSE (p = 0.001). Conclusions: A higher NLR is associated with poorer short-term functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, M. S., Heo, M. Y., Joo, H. J., Shim, G. Y., Chon, J., Chung, S. J., … Yoo, M. C. (2023). Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of Short-Term Functional Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20020898

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free