Reducing the variability between constant-depth film fermenter experiments when modelling oral biofilm

17Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aims: The inherent instabilities associated with the development of multispecies biofilm communities within the constant-depth film fermenter (CDFF) and other microcosm systems can yield unacceptable variability between experiments, which could limit their potential applications in oral microbiology. The extent of this variability needs to be determined and a protocol developed which minimizes it. Methods and Results: Two custom-made CDFFs were supplied concurrently with the same inoculation culture, begat from an aliquot of a saliva pool and artificial saliva growth medium via a dual-channel pump. Transformed log10 data of the viable counts at fixed time points were analysed using the Bland-Altman approach to test for the levels of agreement between two CDFFs running concurrently and those CDFFs run in series. The coefficients95% of agreement were lower (i.e. less variable) in the concurrent model than when run in series for total counts of bacteria (1·238 vs 2·124), Lactobacillus spp. (0·517 vs 1·431) and Mutans streptococci (2·817 vs 3·864). Other measures of variability showed a similar trend. Conclusions: Operating CDFFs concurrently minimizes the degree of difference and variability between them. Significance and Impact of the Study: Operating CDFFs concurrently will improve the sensitivity for experiments that seek to determine the effects of a variable, such as a nutritional supplement or antimicrobial agent, and a control. © 2012 The Authors. Journal of Applied Microbiology © 2012 The Society for Applied Microbiology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hope, C. K., Bakht, K., Burnside, G., Martin, G. C., Burnett, G., de Josselin de Jong, E., & Higham, S. M. (2012). Reducing the variability between constant-depth film fermenter experiments when modelling oral biofilm. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 113(3), 601–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05368.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free