Prognostic factors affecting outcome of multifocal or multicentric glioblastoma: A scoping review

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It has been reported that patients with multiple lesions have shorter overall survival compared to single lesion in glioblastoma (GBM). Number of lesions can profoundly impact the prognosis and treatment outcome in GBM. In view of the advancement of imaging, multiple GBM (mGBM) lesions are increasingly recognized and reported. The scoping review was conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension statement for systematic review. Database was searched to collect relevant articles based on predefined eligibility criteria. Our observations suggest that multifocal/multicentric GBM has poorer outcome compared to GBM with singular lesion (sGBM). As the factors influencing the prognosis and outcome is poorly understood and there is no consensus in the existing literature, this review is clinically relevant. As patients with single lesion are more likely to undergo gross total excision, it is likely that further adjuvant treatment may be decided by extent of resection. This review will be helpful for design of further prospective randomized studies for optimal management of mGBM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Das, S., Mishra, R. K., & Agrawal, A. (2023, April 1). Prognostic factors affecting outcome of multifocal or multicentric glioblastoma: A scoping review. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice. Scientific Scholar LLC. https://doi.org/10.25259/JNRP_41_2022

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free