Neoinstitutionalism and the appropriation of Bourdieu's work: A critical assessment

9Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite the still present hegemony of the structural-functionalist orthodoxy, the mid 1980's witnesses the insurgence of new philosophical approaches. This body of work had become a vital intellectual and ideological resource for those who wanted to confront the functionalist dominance in organization studies, such as structuration theory, labour process theory and neoinstitutionalist theory. The purpose of this paper is to review the incorporation of Bourdieu's work into neoinstitutionalism. I argue that this appropriation has resulted in a significant loss of theoretical strength. By giving place to the cognitivist metaphors of mental models, "scripts" and "schemas", instead of adopting the notion of habitus, neoinstitutionalism reinforces some of the ever-present dichotomies in social sciences, especially those of agency/structure and individual/society. While neoinstitutionalism was refining the cognitive approach in the 1990's, Bourdieu was moving towards psychoanalysis. Some indications for future research are provided in the concluding notes. © RAE.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mangi, L. C. (2009). Neoinstitutionalism and the appropriation of Bourdieu’s work: A critical assessment. RAE Revista de Administracao de Empresas, 49(3), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902009000300007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free