Assessment of antiphospholipid antibodies profiles based on severity of COVID-19 pneumonia

5Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: thrombotic events are the most severe complications of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is known that antiphospholipid antibodies (APL) could be involved in thrombosis mechanism. Thus, APL profiles were studied particularly in patients with severe and critical COVID-19, and their clinical impact. Methods: a retrospective study of 54 COVID-19 hospitalized patients (34 in intensive care unit (ICU) and 20 in non-ICU) was conducted. These COVID-19 patients were tested for the presence of LAC (lupus anticoagulant) using the ACLTOP750®, anti-cardiolipine (ACL) and anti-β2glycoprotéine I (anti-β2GPI) IgG/IgM/IgA by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). IgA isotype was tested in only 25 patients. Results: antiphospholipid antibodies were present in 74.1% of tested patients. LAC positivity was the highest (60.8%) among all patients, followed by IgM aCL (18.5%) and IgM anti-β2GPI (14.8%). Besides, LAC and anti-β2GPI IgA were the most predominant APL regarding the 25 patients tested for IgA isotype (52% and 24% respectively). Nine patients had thrombotic events, among them 6 were positive in APL and 5 were positive in LAC. However, there was any significant association between APL positivity or titers and thrombosis. There was also no significant difference between the two COVID-19 groups regarding APL profiles. Conclusion: given the relatively high frequency of APL and especially LAC, and given the multitude of thrombotic risk factors in these severely and critically ill COVID-19 patients, a prophylactic anticoagulation remains essential.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bnina, A. B., Dhia, R. B., Gnaba, S., Annabi, A., Chouchane, S., Naija, W., … Bouatay, A. (2022). Assessment of antiphospholipid antibodies profiles based on severity of COVID-19 pneumonia. Pan African Medical Journal, 42. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2022.42.110.33020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free