Past Performance and Executive compensation: Evidence from Indonesia

0Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This research examine the pay-for-performance hypothesis by studying Indonesian firms during the global financial crisis. Controlling for some firm fundamental factors and industry, we find that there is strong evidence that past performance drives the compensation paid to executives. This paper also reveals that financial firms tend to compensate their executive higher than those of non-financial firms. State-owned firms compensate a higher salary for their directors and commissioners than those of privately owned firms. Pay-for-performance system might reduce the agency problem between managers and shareholders, on the other side; however, this system might also reinforce the incentive for managers to take risk which subsequently increases the degree of riskiness of firms.

References Powered by Scopus

Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure

35764Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance

2459Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Large stakes and big mistakes

459Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wahyuni, S. (2014). Past Performance and Executive compensation: Evidence from Indonesia. Asian Social Science, 10(22), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n22p241

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

64%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

36%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 6

55%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3

27%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

9%

Computer Science 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free