Importance of resource selection and social behavior to partitioning of hostile space by sympatric canids

35Citations
Citations of this article
230Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Investigations into mechanisms of resource partitioning are particularly suited to systems where nascent interactive behaviors are observable. Wolf (Canis lupus) recolonization of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem provided such a system, and we were able to identify behaviors influencing the partitioning of resources by coyotes (Canis latrans) and wolves. We observed coyotewolf interactions immediately after wolf recolonization, when reemergent behaviors mediating the outcome of competitive interactions were detectable and mechanisms of spatial avoidance were identifiable. Although coyotes used the same space as wolves, they likely minimized risk of encounter by making adaptive changes in resource selection based on perception of wolf activity and potential scavenging opportunities. When exploiting carrion subsidies (i.e., wolf-killed ungulates), coyotes relied on social behaviors (i.e., numerical advantage in concert with heightened aggression) to mitigate escalating risk from wolves and increase resource-holding potential. By adapting behaviors to fluctuating risk, coyotes might reduce the amplitude of competitive asymmetries. We concluded coyotes do not perceive wolves as a threat requiring generalized spatial avoidance. Rather, the threat of aggressive interactions with wolves is spatially discrete and primarily contained to areas adjacent to carrion resources. © 2009 American Society of Mammalogists.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Atwood, T. C., & Gese, E. M. (2010). Importance of resource selection and social behavior to partitioning of hostile space by sympatric canids. Journal of Mammalogy, 91(2), 490–499. https://doi.org/10.1644/09-MAMM-A-078.1

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 101

62%

Researcher 48

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 13

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 142

72%

Environmental Science 50

25%

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 3

2%

Social Sciences 2

1%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free