Further evidence that infection is an infrequent cause of first trimester spontaneous abortion

9Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A previous cohort study found no clinical evidence that infection occurred more often in subjects experiencing pregnancy loss compared with those experiencing successful pregnancy. Given these surprising findings, we conducted a similar analysis on another cohort also followed prospectively. Using couples practising natural family planning for conception or contraception, information on clinical evidence of infection was gathered beginning with week 5 of gestation. Information on fever and signs of overt infection was specifically sought by interview and physical examination. Frequencies of urinary, vaginal and other infections in subjects experiencing pregnancy loss were 11.1, 9.5 and 8.7% respectively, not significantly different from rates in subjects having liveborns (10.1, 10.2 and 10.3% respectively). Thus, no association between clinical infection and early pregnancy loss (≤ 16 weeks) was observed. Cohort studies utilizing biologically based assays are awaited because extant data do not provide evidence that clinically evident infections play major roles in first trimester pregnancy losses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Simpson, J. L., Gray, R. H., Queenan, J. T., Barbato, M., Perez, A., Mena, P., … Jennings, V. (1996). Further evidence that infection is an infrequent cause of first trimester spontaneous abortion. Human Reproduction, 11(9), 2058–2060. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019543

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free