Many environmental social scientists have seen our role as only empirically describing what occurs, from public opinion to social movements and risk perception. What is to be the contribution of environmental social sciences to imagining and building new low-carbon societies? This chapter reviews the “history of futuring” and its relation to environmental sociology. The rise of the concept of just transitions in particular and societal transitions more broadly have driven a new wave of envisioning of post-carbon futures, which has forced a set of more propositional approaches. We sketch eight positions, including the dominant “natural capitalism” and “breakthrough” ecomodernism, queer and anti-colonial transition thinking, and Geels’ multi-level perspective to design for transition. We review a number of red/green approaches: from “degrowth” and solidarity economics to red/green productivism and state-centered approaches, including the Green New Deal. Together, these represent significant new directions for environmental social sciences: not only describing social change, but also leading it. We argue this reconstructive turn in the environmental social sciences is much needed.
CITATION STYLE
White, D., & Roberts, J. T. (2020). Post Carbon Transition Futuring: For a Reconstructive Turn in the Environmental Social Sciences? In The Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Sociology: Volume 1 (Vol. 1, pp. 223–242). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108554510.016
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.