Analysis of discursive patterns for curricular contextualization

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

With the application of remote education due to the pandemic, Ecuadorian teachers contextualized the curriculum to the needs of their students. The objective was to analyse emerging dialogue patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on teachers’ experiences and stories about their interaction with their students. The research was qualitative in which the method of indirect observation of the transcription of 73 semi-structured interviews with teachers from educational institutions in Ecuador was applied through the Zoom platform. To analyze the results, they were categorized and conceptualized following the triple pattern of dialogue and discourse proposed by Mehan in its three dimensions: initiation, response and evaluation. Three phases were established: construction of the final indirect observation instrument; quality control of the information so that there is no subjectivity through the agreement of the criteria of three research authors; and the interpretation of indirect observation through contextualization by curricular contents, methodological strategies and didactic resources. It is revealed that teachers demonstrated remarkable adaptation during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on emotional containment and creativity.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Competency-based Curriculum: A New Approach to Curricular Change

1Citations
7Readers

This article is free to access.

0Citations
8Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Posso-Pacheco, R. J., Cóndor-Chicaiza, M. G., Cóndor-Chicaiza, J. D. R., Paz-Viteri, B. S., Arufe-Giráldez, V., Sanmiguel-Rodríguez, A., & Ortiz Bravo, N. A. (2024). Analysis of discursive patterns for curricular contextualization. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i6.2133

Readers over time

‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

86%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 2

33%

Engineering 2

33%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

17%

Mathematics 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0