Towards Quantifying Magnitude of Political Bias in News Articles Using a Novel Annotation Schema

2Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Media bias is a predominant phenomenon present in most forms of print and electronic media such as news articles, blogs, tweets, etc. Since media plays a pivotal role in shaping public opinion towards political happenings, both political parties and media houses often use such sources as outlets to propagate their own prejudices to the public. There has been some research on detecting political bias in news articles. However, none of it attempts to analyse the nature of bias or quantify the magnitude of the bias in a given text. This paper presents a political bias annotated corpus viz. PoBiCo-21, which is annotated using a schema specifically designed with 10 labels to capture various techniques used to create political bias in news. We create a ranking of these techniques based on their contribution to bias. After validating the ranking, we propose methods to use it to quantify the magnitude of bias in political news articles.

References Powered by Scopus

Primetime spin: Media bias and belief confirming information

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exploiting subjectivity analysis in blogs to improve political leaning categorization

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The rhetoric of “Whataboutism” in American journalism and political identity

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Measuring Political Bias in Large Language Models: What Is Said and How It Is Said

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kameswari, L., & Mamidi, R. (2021). Towards Quantifying Magnitude of Political Bias in News Articles Using a Novel Annotation Schema. In International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, RANLP (pp. 671–678). Incoma Ltd. https://doi.org/10.26615/978-954-452-072-4_076

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

50%

Researcher 4

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 12

67%

Linguistics 4

22%

Neuroscience 1

6%

Social Sciences 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0