Septic shock attributed to Candida infection: Importance of empiric therapy and source control

382Citations
Citations of this article
251Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. Delayed treatment of candidemia has previously been shown to be an important determinant of patient outcome. However, septic shock attributed to Candida infection and its determinants of outcome have not been previously evaluated in a large patient population.Methods.A retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with septic shock and blood cultures positive for Candida species was conducted at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, a 1250-bed urban teaching hospital (January 2002-December 2010).Results.Two hundred twenty-four consecutive patients with septic shock and a positive blood culture for Candida species were identified. Death during hospitalization occurred among 155 (63.5) patients. The hospital mortality rate for patients having adequate source control and antifungal therapy administered within 24 hours of the onset of shock was 52.8 (n = 142), compared to a mortality rate of 97.6 (n = 82) in patients who did not have these goals attained (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kollef, M., Micek, S., Hampton, N., Doherty, J. A., & Kumar, A. (2012). Septic shock attributed to Candida infection: Importance of empiric therapy and source control. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 54(12), 1739–1746. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis305

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free