Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Incidence and Risk Factors in a National, Community-Based Prospective Cohort of US Adults

7Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Prospective cohort studies of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) incidence complement case-based surveillance and cross-sectional seroprevalence surveys. Methods: We estimated the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a national cohort of 6738 US adults, enrolled in March-August 2020. Using Poisson models, we examined the association of social distancing and a composite epidemiologic risk score with seroconversion. The risk score was created using least absolute shrinkage selection operator (LASSO) regression to identify factors predictive of seroconversion. The selected factors were household crowding, confirmed case in household, indoor dining, gathering with groups of ≥10, and no masking in gyms or salons. Results: Among 4510 individuals with ≥1 serologic test, 323 (7.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 6.5%-8.1%]) seroconverted by January 2021. Among 3422 participants seronegative in May-September 2020 and retested from November 2020 to January 2021, 161 seroconverted over 1646 person-years of follow-up (9.8 per 100 person-years [95% CI, 8.3-11.5]). The seroincidence rate was lower among women compared with men (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.69 [95% CI,. 50-.94]) and higher among Hispanic (2.09 [1.41-3.05]) than white non-Hispanic participants. In adjusted models, participants who reported social distancing with people they did not know (IRR for always vs never social distancing, 0.42 [95% CI,. 20-1.0]) and with people they knew (IRR for always vs never, 0.64 [.39-1.06]; IRR for sometimes vs never, 0.60 [.38-.96]) had lower seroconversion risk. Seroconversion risk increased with epidemiologic risk score (IRR for medium vs low score, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.03-2.81]; IRR for high vs low score, 3.49 [2.26-5.58]). Only 29% of those who seroconverted reported isolating, and only 19% were asked about contacts. Conclusions: Modifiable risk factors and poor reach of public health strategies drove SARS-CoV-2 transmission across the United States.

References Powered by Scopus

Regression Shrinkage and Selection Via the Lasso

35678Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients with 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China

17160Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The incubation period of coronavirus disease 2019 (CoVID-19) from publicly reported confirmed cases: Estimation and application

3994Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Exposure, Disease Susceptibility, and Clinical Outcomes during COVID-19 Pandemic in National Cohort of Adults, United States

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Household factors and the risk of severe COVID-like illness early in the U.S. pandemic

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Persistence of antibody responses to COVID-19 vaccines among participants in the COVID-19 Community Research Partnership

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nash, D., Rane, M. S., Robertson, M. M., Chang, M., Kulkarni, S. G., Zimba, R., … Grov, C. (2023). Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Incidence and Risk Factors in a National, Community-Based Prospective Cohort of US Adults. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 76(3), E375–E384. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac423

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

40%

Researcher 2

40%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 2

33%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

33%

Chemical Engineering 1

17%

Neuroscience 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free