Discretion in the Policy Process

7Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter examines discretion in the policy process. On the basis of an examination of the theoretical literature, some specific insights are identified. First, discretion concerns the freedom to act as granted in a set of rules. Second, the way a rule is applied leaves the rule intact. Third, norms aimed to prescribe action stem from many sources in addition to formal rules. Fourth, cultural standards and the institutional context are important sources. Fifth, the degree of legitimacy of practised discretion will vary. This theoretical examination leads on to an exploration of where discretion is located in the policy process. Discretion can be found in street-level implementation, but not only there. It appears to be granted as well as exercised at a multiplicity of points within an overall context, in which both vertical and horizontal power relationships may apply. Hence from an ‘output’ perspective, the study of discretion concerns the question how laws or other norms ‘work’ within a multi-layered structure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hupe, P., & Hill, M. (2019). Discretion in the Policy Process. In Discretion and the Quest for Controlled Freedom (pp. 237–258). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19566-3_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free