Meta-analysis indicates that common variants at the DISC1 locus are not associated with schizophrenia

66Citations
Citations of this article
101Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Several polymorphisms in the Disrupted-in-Schizophrenia-1 (DISC1) gene are reported to be associated with schizophrenia. However, to date, there has been little effort to evaluate the evidence for association systematically. We carried out an imputation-driven meta-analysis, the most comprehensive to date, using data collected from 10 candidate gene studies and three genome-wide association studies containing a total of 11 626 cases and 15 237 controls. We tested 1241 single-nucleotide polymorphisms in total, and estimated that our power to detect an effect from a variant with minor allele frequency >5% was 99% for an odds ratio of 1.5 and 51% for an odds ratio of 1.1. We find no evidence that common variants at the DISC1 locus are associated with schizophrenia. © 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Meta-analysis in clinical trials

32879Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis

27052Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing

6399Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Linking neurodevelopmental and synaptic theories of mental illness through DISC1

339Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluating historical candidate genes for schizophrenia

231Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dendritic Spine Plasticity: Function and Mechanisms

124Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mathieson, I., Munafò, M. R., & Flint, J. (2012). Meta-analysis indicates that common variants at the DISC1 locus are not associated with schizophrenia. Molecular Psychiatry, 17(6), 634–641. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2011.41

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 31

46%

Researcher 21

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 14

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32

46%

Medicine and Dentistry 18

26%

Psychology 11

16%

Neuroscience 9

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0