Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers

60Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Biological age is the concept of using biophysiological measures to more accurately determine an individual’s age-related risk of adverse outcomes. Grading of the degree of frailty and measuring biomarkers are distinct methods of measuring biological age. This review compares these strategies for estimating biological age for clinical purposes. Recent Findings: The degree of frailty predicts susceptibility to adverse outcomes independently of chronological age. The utility of this approach has been demonstrated across a range of clinical contexts. Biomarkers from various levels of the biological aging process are improving in accuracy, with the potential to identify aberrant aging trajectories before the onset of clinically manifest frailty. Summary: Grading of frailty is a demonstrably, clinically, and research-relevant proxy estimate of biological age. Emerging biomarkers can supplement this approach by identifying accelerated aging before it is clinically apparent. Some biomarkers may even offer a means by which interventions to reduce the rate of aging can be developed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Diebel, L. W. M., & Rockwood, K. (2021, September 1). Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers. Current Oncology Reports. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-021-01097-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free