Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers

71Citations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Biological age is the concept of using biophysiological measures to more accurately determine an individual’s age-related risk of adverse outcomes. Grading of the degree of frailty and measuring biomarkers are distinct methods of measuring biological age. This review compares these strategies for estimating biological age for clinical purposes. Recent Findings: The degree of frailty predicts susceptibility to adverse outcomes independently of chronological age. The utility of this approach has been demonstrated across a range of clinical contexts. Biomarkers from various levels of the biological aging process are improving in accuracy, with the potential to identify aberrant aging trajectories before the onset of clinically manifest frailty. Summary: Grading of frailty is a demonstrably, clinically, and research-relevant proxy estimate of biological age. Emerging biomarkers can supplement this approach by identifying accelerated aging before it is clinically apparent. Some biomarkers may even offer a means by which interventions to reduce the rate of aging can be developed.

References Powered by Scopus

Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype

18234Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The hallmarks of aging

10932Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Frailty in elderly people

6681Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Clinical biomarker-based biological aging and risk of cancer in the UK Biobank

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Management of inflammatory bowel diseases in older adults

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Immunosenescence and Altered Vaccine Efficiency in Older Subjects: A Myth Difficult to Change

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Diebel, L. W. M., & Rockwood, K. (2021, September 1). Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers. Current Oncology Reports. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-021-01097-9

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25010203040

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

69%

Researcher 5

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

9%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 19

58%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 7

21%

Neuroscience 4

12%

Engineering 3

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0