Speculative Multipliers on DeFi: Quantifying On-Chain Leverage Risks

3Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Blockchains and DeFi have consistently shown to attract financial speculators. One avenue to increase the potential upside (and risks) of financial speculation is leverage trading, in which a trader borrows assets to participate in the financial market. While well-known over-collateralized loans, such as MakerDAO, only enable leverage multipliers of 1.67 ×, new under-collateralized lending platforms, such as Alpha Homora (AH), unlock leverage multipliers of up to 8 × and attracted over 1.2B USD of locked value at the time of writing. In this paper, we are the first to formalize a model for under-collateralized DeFi lending platforms. We analytically exposit and empirically evaluate the three main risks of a leverage-engaging borrower: (i) impermanent loss (IL) inherent to Automated Market Makers (AMMs), (ii) arbitrage loss in AMMs, and (iii) collateral liquidation. Based on our analytical and empirical results of AH over a timeframe of 9 months, we find that a borrower may mitigate the IL through a high leverage multiplier (e.g., more than 4 × ) and a margin trading before supplying borrowed assets into AMMs. We interestingly find that the arbitrage and liquidation losses are proportional to the leverage multiplier. In addition, we find that 72.35% of the leverage taking borrowers suffer from a negative APY, when ignoring the governance token incentivization in AH. Finally, when assuming a maximum ± 10 % move among two stablecoins, we pave the way for more extreme on-chain leverage multipliers of up to 91.9 × by providing appropriate system settings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, Z., Qin, K., Minh, D. V., & Gervais, A. (2022). Speculative Multipliers on DeFi: Quantifying On-Chain Leverage Risks. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 13411 LNCS, pp. 38–56). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18283-9_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free