Controllability measures for disturbance rejection

13Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Some plants have better "built-in" disturbance rejection capabilities than others, that is, their dynamic resilience (controllability) with respect to disturbance rejection is better. In the paper we consider controller independent disturbance measures for six classes of problems: 1. Open-loop disturbance sensitivity. 2. Disturbance sensitivity for decentralized control. 3. Disturbance sensitivity for system under partial control. 4. Input magnitude for rejecting disturbances. 5. Output magnitude for disturbances in the presence of input limitations. 6. Maximum disturbance range. For all six problems we obtain frequency-dependent measures, and appropriate scaling of the variables is crucial for interpreting these measures. In the paper we also discuss the relationship between these measures and the Relative Disturbance Gain (RDG) of McAvoy and coworkers and the disturbance condition number of Skogestad and Morari.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Skogestad, S., & Wolff, E. A. (1996). Controllability measures for disturbance rejection. Modeling, Identification and Control, 17(3), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.4173/mic.1996.3.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free