The local bias in equity crowdfunding: Behavioral anomaly or rational preference?

10Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We use data on individual investment decisions to analyze whether investors in equity crowdfunding direct their investments to local firms and whether specific investor types can explain this behavior. We then examine whether investments exhibiting a local bias are more or less likely to fail. We show that investors exhibit a local bias, even when we control for those with personal ties to the entrepreneur. In particular, we find that angel-like investors and investors with personal ties to the entrepreneur exhibit a larger local bias than regular crowd investors. Well-diversified investors are less likely to suffer from this behavioral anomaly than investors with personal ties to the entrepreneur. Overall, we show that investors who direct their investments to local firms more often pick start-ups that run into insolvency, which indicates that some local investments in equity crowdfunding constitute a behavioral anomaly rather than a rational preference. Moreover, our results reveal that platform design is an important factor determining the scope of the behavior anomaly.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hornuf, L., Schmitt, M., & Stenzhorn, E. (2022). The local bias in equity crowdfunding: Behavioral anomaly or rational preference? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 31(3), 693–733. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12475

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free