International survey on esophageal cancer: Part I surgical techniques

77Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In patients with esophageal cancer, radical surgical resection of the esophagus and surrounding lymph nodes is the only curative treatment option. Nevertheless, no standard surgical procedure exists. The aims of the present study were to gain insight into the frequencies of the various surgical techniques in esophageal cancer surgery as applied by surgeons throughout the world and to identify intercontinental differences regarding surgical techniques. Surgeons with particular interest in esophageal surgery, including members of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, the European Society of Esophagology Group d'Etude Européen des Maladies de l'Oesophage and the OESO, were invited to participate in an online questionnaire. Questions were asked regarding approach to esophagectomy, extent of lymphadenectomy (LND), type of reconstruction, and anastomotic techniques. Subanalyses were performed for the surgeons' case volume per year, years of experience in esophageal cancer surgery, and continent. Of 567 invited surgeons, 269 participated, resulting in an overall response rate of 47%. The responders currently performing esophagectomies (n = 250; 44%), represented 41 countries across the six continents. Fifty-two percent of responders favor open transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) over transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) or minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). THE is preferred by 26%, whereas MIE is favored by 14%. Eight percent have no preference for one approach to esophagectomy over the other. The extent of LND is most frequently the 2-field, routinely performed by 73% of surgeons. The continuity of the digestive tract is most frequently restored with a gastric conduit (85%). In open TTE, the anastomosis is routinely created in the neck by 56% of responders and in the chest by 40%. Cervical anastomoses are routinely fashioned by means of a handsewn technique by 65% of responders, while 35% favor the stapled technique. The cervical incision is predominantly performed vertically on the left side of the neck (routinely by 66%). A horizontal neck incision is routinely carried out by 19% of responders and a vertical right-sided incision by 11%. Significant differences in surgical techniques could be detected between low- and high-volume surgeons, between surgeons with ≤10 versus ≥21 years of experience, and between surgeons from different continents. In conclusion, currently the most commonly applied surgical procedure is the open right-sided transthoracic approach with a two-field lymphadenectomy, using a gastric tube anastomosed at the left side of the neck by means of a handsewn, end-to-side technique. The results of this survey provide baseline data for future research and for the development of international guidelines. © 2009 International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

References Powered by Scopus

Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: Defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world

3169Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Web surveys: A review of issues and approaches

1448Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus

1441Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Worldwide trends in surgical techniques in the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer

204Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Oesophageal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

204Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial)

147Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boone, J., Livestro, D. P., Elias, S. G., Borel Rinkes, I. H. M., & van Hillegersberg, R. (2009). International survey on esophageal cancer: Part I surgical techniques. Diseases of the Esophagus, 22(3), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2008.00929.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

46%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

31%

Researcher 5

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 25

93%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

4%

Neuroscience 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free