"Where the Danger Lies": Race, Gender, and Chinese and Japanese Exclusion in the United States, 1870-19241

Abstract

Race too often is used as the explanatory variable for understanding immigration exclusion, marginalizing the significance of race making, ethnic differentiation, and gender construction in particular. This article explores these processes by examining exclusionary policies implemented against Chinese and Japanese immigrants from the mid-1870s to 1924, the year the National Origins Act was passed. Politicians, intellectuals, and moral reformers used a gendered logic-the construction of idealized gender norms, roles, and sexual propriety and the attachment of these meanings to male and female bodies-to distinguish Japanese immigrants from the Chinese immigrants they followed, allowing for ethnic differentiation and dissimilar policies. The convergence toward exclusion rested on a racialized logic-the construction and attachment of inferior status and meanings to immigrant groups through discourse, formal and informal categorization, or social closure-which claimed that the Japanese were unassimilable and racially undesirable like the Chinese. Exclusionists focused on the immigrant women, decrying their sexual and gender impropriety as evidence of the groups' threats to the sanctity of white families, which imperiled the nation. Gender and race both mattered in these logics and their meanings were constructed as their salience interconnected. © 2010 Eastern Sociological Society.