Asymmetry in pay-off predicts how familiar individuals respond to one another

15Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Familiarity influences individual decision-making in many vertebrate species. Here, we propose that familiarity modulates behaviour to different extents depending on the social context of the interaction. Specifically, the more that one player stands to gain relative to the other, the less important familiarity will be in influencing their responses to one another. We test this prediction using pairs of male guppies (Poecilia reticulata) in three competitive scenarios of increasing asymmetry in outcome to the two players: schooling under potential threat (similar outcomes), competing for a defensible food source (some asymmetry) and competing for a receptive female (strongly asymmetrical outcomes). Males show a graded response as asymmetry increases, with familiarity producing marked behavioural differences under potential threat, minor changes when competing for food, but none at all in competition for mating opportunities. This suggests that mutualistic benefits can arise as a by-product of selfish behaviour, supporting the role of pseudo-reciprocity in the evolution of cooperation. © 2013 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Granroth-Wilding, H. M. V., & Magurran, A. E. (2013). Asymmetry in pay-off predicts how familiar individuals respond to one another. Biology Letters, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0025

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free