Pragmatics Always Matters: An Expanded Vision of Experimental Pragmatics

13Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Much of the work in experimental pragmatics is devoted to testing empirical hypotheses that arise within the study of linguistic and philosophical pragmatics. The focus in much of this work is focused on those aspects of communicated meaning that are “inferred” rather than understood through linguistic “coding” processes. Under this view, pragmatic meanings emerge secondarily after purely linguistic meanings are accessed or computed. Our aim in this article is to greatly broaden the scope of experimental pragmatic studies by calling for much greater emphasis on the complete pragmatics of language use. Pragmatics is continuously present and constrains people’s real-time production and processing of language in context. Experimental pragmatics should attend more to the particularities of pragmatic experience through closer examination of the people we study, the specific tasks used to assess understanding, as well as the actual complex meanings people interpret in diverse contexts. The many specifics of human pragmatics demand the study and theoretical inclusion of many bodily, linguistic, and situational factors that make up each instance of meaning making.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (2020). Pragmatics Always Matters: An Expanded Vision of Experimental Pragmatics. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01619

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free