South African corresponding authors on perceived beneficiaries and the nature of university research

  • Boshoff N
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

About 2 000 corresponding authors of articles in the Web of Science (who had a South African university address) selected from a list of 22 categories the perceived beneficiaries of their research. A beneficiary was defined as an entity that is either directly affected by the research results or that has a direct interest in the outcome of the research. The objective was to classify the corresponding authors into meaningful clusters based on similarities in their responses about the perceived beneficiaries, and to construct a profile for each cluster in terms of eight measures of basic research. Eleven beneficiary clusters were identified and appropriately labelled. Three of the clusters with a combined share of 42 per cent had an almost exclusive focus on the research and academic community. Respectively 33 per cent and 59 per cent of 'pure basic research' and 'oriented basic research' projects appeared in clusters that contained beneficiaries from outside the public research and academic communities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boshoff, N. (2017). South African corresponding authors on perceived beneficiaries and the nature of university research. South African Journal of Higher Education, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.20853/31-3-803

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free