Morphogenesis, structural stability and epigenetic landscape

5Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter offers a commentary on the correspondence exchanged between René Thom and Conrad Hal Waddington in 1967, concerning the interpretation in terms of catastrophe theory of the concepts of epigenetic landscape and chreod, introduced by Conrad Hal Waddington since the 1940s. It is intended to provide some elements of reflection on the difficulties encountered in exchanges between a mathematician and a biologist on the subject of the mathematization- in this case by means of a dynamical systems approach- of a theoretical question in biology, expressed in images by the compound metaphor of epigenetic landscape. One interpretation of the disagreement between the two scholars is based on the difference between their mathematical cultures, making it difficult to establish a shared dictionary (this was René Thom's view). But another aspect must be taken into account to understand the difficulties of dialogue between the two scientists: the choice of variables (and the timescale specific to each of them) used to construct a mathematical model of the epigenetic landscape. © 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Franceschelli, S. (2011). Morphogenesis, structural stability and epigenetic landscape. In Morphogenesis: Origins of Patterns and Shapes (pp. 283–293). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13174-5_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free